Determination of optimized sediment rating equation and its relationship with physical characteristics of watershed in semiarid regions: A case study of Pol-Doab watershed, Iran

Document Type: Research Paper


1 Faculty of Natural Resources, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Yazd Regional Water Authority, Yazd, Iran


Managers always consider the precise estimation of sediments in watersheds due to various conditions, such as
soil and water resources management, construction, infrastructure and economical and social issues. In this condition,
an optimized determination of sediment rating equation (typical method until now for sediment yield estimation) is
essential to investigate sediment yield in rivers. In this study, the best sediment rating equation was determined for
four hydrometric stations of Pol-Doab watershed in Markazi province using sediment rating curves types (singlelinear,
multi-linear, mean loads) together with bias correction factors (FAO, Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimator
[QMLE], Smearing, Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator [MVUE] and β). The results showed that the optimized
equation in stations is the mean loads (MVUE), which can used for prediction of sediment yield in annual scale.
Moreover, FAO factor is more accurate for the estimation of sediment yield in high variability conditions for
monthly, weekly and daily scales. According to the obtained results, accurate representation of variability intensity of
sediment yield is associated with the rating curves types, since the monthly rating curve is more accurate. Also, the
results indicated that the watershed average slope has direct relation with b coefficient of rating equation, and when
using this parameter, the rate of sediment yield can be determined for month, season and hydrological periods. Based
on the obtained results, with increase in the watershed average slope, the slope of suspended sediment concentration
(SSC) equation is also increased.


Achite, M., S. Ouillon, 2007. Suspended sediment
transport in a semiarid watershed, Wadi Abd, Algeria
(1973–1995). Journal of Hydrology, 343; 187– 202.
Ahmadi, H., S. Taheri S. Feiznia, H. Azarnivand, 2011.
Runoff and sediment yield modeling using WEPP in
a semi-arid environment (Case study: Orazan
Watershed), Desert, 16(1); 5-12.
Asselman, N.E.M., 1999. Suspended sediment dynamics
in a large drainage basin: The River Rhine. Hydrol.
Process, 13:1437-1450.
Blanco, M.L.R., M.M.T Castro, L. Palleiro, M.T.T.
Castro, M.T.T., 2010. Temporal changes in
suspended sediment transport in an Atlantic
catchment, NW Spain. Geomorphology, 123; 181–
Cohn, T.A., DL.L. elong, E.J. Gilory, R.M. Hirsch, D.K.
Wells, 1989. Estimating constituent loads. Water
Resources Research. 25; 937-942.
Cohn, T.A., 1995. Recent advances in statistical methods
for the estimation of sediment and nutrient transport
in rivers. Reviews in Geophysics, Supplement, pp.
Duan, N., 1983. Smearing estimate, a nonparametric
retransformation method. Journal of American
Statistical Association, 78; 605-610.
Endreny, Th., J. Hassett, 2005. Robustness of pollutant
loading estimators for sample size reduction in a
suburban watershed. Intl. J. River Basin Management
(IAHR & INBO), 3; 53-66.
Ferguson, R., 1987. Accuracy and precision of methods
for estimating river loads. Earth Surface Processes
and Land Forms. 12: 95-104.
Harrington Seán T.a, R. Harrington Joseph, 2013. An
assessment of the suspended sediment rating curve
approach for load estimation on the Rivers Bandon
and Owenabue, Ireland. Geomorphology,
185; 27-38
Horowitz, A., 2002. The use of rating (transport) curves
to predict suspended sediment concentration: A
matter of temporal resolution. Peachtree Business
Center. Turbidity and Other Sediment Surrogates
Workshop, 3 p.
Horowitz, A.J., 2003. An evaluation of sediment rating
curves for estimating suspended sediment
concentrations for subsequent flux calculations.
Hydrol. Process, 17; 3387–3409
Hu, B., H. Wang, Z. Yang, X. Sun, 2011. Temporal and
spatial variations of sediment rating curves in the
Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin and their
implications. Quaternary International, 230; 34- 43.
Iadanza, C., F. Napolitano, 2006. Sediment transport
time series in the Tiber River. Physics and Chemistry
of the Earth, 31; 1212-1227.
Jansson M. B., 1996. Estimating a sediment rating curve
of the Reventaz6n River at Palomo using logged
mean loads within discharge classes. Journal of
Hydrology, 183; 227-241.
Jones, K.R., Q. Berney, D.P. Carr, E.C. Barret, 1981.
Arid zone hydrology for agricultural development.
FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 37; 271 p.
Kao, Sh., T. Lee, J.D. Milliman, 2005. Calculating
highly fluctuated suspended sediment fluxes from
mountainous rivers in Taiwan. TAO, 16; 653-675.
Khanchoul, K., R. Altschul, F. Assassi, 2009. Estimating
suspended sediment yield, sedimentation controls and
impacts in the Mellah Catchment of Northern
Algeria. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2; 257-271.
Ladewig, M.D., 2006. Sediment transport rates in the
lower Muskegon River and tributaries. A thesis
submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Master of Science (Natural
Resources and Environment) in the University of
Michigan, 72 p.
Lewis, J., 1996. Turbidity-controlled suspended
sediment sampling for runoff-event load estimation.
Water Resources Research, 32; 2299-2310.
Memarian Khalilabad H., S. Feiznia, K. Zakikhani,
2009. Estimating river suspended sediment yield
using MLP neural network in arid and semi-arid
basins Case study: Bar River, Neyshaboor, Iran,
Desert, 14(1); 43-52.

Mimikou, M., 1982. An investigation of suspended
sediment rating curves in western and northern
Greece. Hydrological Sciences - Journal - des
Sciences Hydrologiques, 27; 369-383.
Pandey, A., V.M. Chowdary, B.C. Mal, M. Billib, 2007.
Runoff and sediment yield modeling from a small
agricultural watershed in India using the WEPP
model. Journal of Hydrology, HYDROL 15931, 35 p.
Pandey, A., V.M. Chowdary, B.C. Mal, 2009. Sediment
yield modelling of an agricultural watershed using
MUSLE, remote sensing and GIS. Paddy Water
Environ. 7; 105-113.
Preston, S.V., J. Bierman, S.E. Silliman, 1989. An
evaluation of methods for the Estimation of tributary
mass loads. Water Resources Research, 25(6); 1379-
Sadeghi, S.H.R., T. Mizuyama, S. Miyata, T. Gomi, K.
Kosugi, T. Fukushima, S. Mizugaki, Y. Onda, 2008a.
Development, evaluation and interpretation of
sediment rating curves for a Japanese small
mountainous reforested watershed. Geoderma,
144; 198-211.
Sadeghi, S.H.R., T. Mizuyama, S. Miyata, T. Gomi, K.
Kosugi, T. Fukushima, S. Mizugaki, Y. Onda,
2008b. Determinant factors of sediment graphs and
rating loops in a reforested watershed. Journal of
Hydrology, 356; 271-282.
Smith, C.J., B.F.W. Croke, L.T.H. Newham, 2005.
Predicting suspended sediment loads at a catchment
scale: A comparison between models. A centre for
resource and environmental studies, The Australian
National University, 1175-1181.
Soler, M., J. Latron, F. Gallart, 2007. Relationships
between suspended sediment concentrations and
discharge in two small research basins in a
mountainous, Mediterranean area (Vallcebre, Eastern
Pyrenees). Geomorphology-02336: 10p.
Syvitski, J.P., M.D. Morehead, D.B. Bahr, T. Mulder,
2000. Estimating fluvial sediment transport: The
rating parameters. Water resources research, 36(9);
Walling, DE., 1977. Assessing the accuracy of
suspended sediment rating curves for a small basin.
Water Resources Research, 12; 1869–1894.
Walling, D.E., B.W. Weeb, 1988. The reliability of
rating curve estimates of suspended sediment yield:
some further comments. IAHS Publ, 174; 337-350.
Warrick, J.A., D.M. Rubin, 2007. Suspended-sediment
rating curve response to urbanization and wildfire,
Santa Ana River, California. Journal of Geophysical
Research, 112(F2); 1-13.
Zarris, D., D. Koutsoyiannis, 2005. Evaluating sediment
yield estimations from large-scale hydrologic systems
using the rating curve concept. Material and
Geoenvironment, 52(1); 157-159.
Zhang, W., X. Wei, Z. Jinhai, Z. Yuliang, Y. Zhang,
2012. Estimating suspended sediment loads in the
Pearl River Delta region using sediment rating
curves. Continental Shelf Research, 38; 35-46.