Comparison of different algorithms for land use mapping in dry climate using satellite images: a case study of the Central regions of Iran

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

2 Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran

3 Faculty of Natural Resources, Ardekan University, Ardekan, Iran

4 Faculty of Natural Resources, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine the best model and compare performances in terms of producing land
use maps from six supervised classification algorithms. As a result, different algorithms such as the minimum distance of
mean (MDM), Mahalanobis distance (MD), maximum likelihood (ML), artificial neural network (ANN), spectral angle
mapper (SAM), and support vector machine (SVM) were considered in three areas of Iran's dry climate. The selected
study areas for dry climates were Shahreza, Taft and Zarand in Isfahan, Yazd, and Kerman Provinces, respectively. Three
Landsat ETM+ images and topographical maps of 1:25,000-scale were used in the present study. In addition, training
samples for each land use were constructed using GPS and extensive field surveys. The training sites were divided into
two categories; one category was used for image classification and the other for classification accuracy assessment.
Results show that for the dry climate areas, Maximum Likelihood and Support Vector Machine algorithms with averages
of 0.9409 and 0.9315 Kappa coefficients are the best algorithms for land use mapping. The ANOVA test was performed on
Kappa coefficients, and the result shows that there are significant differences at the 1% level, between the different
algorithms for the dry climate zones. These results can be used for land use planning, as well as environmental and natural
resources purposes in study areas.

Keywords


Aguilar, M.A., M.M. Saldaña, F.J. Aguilar, 2012.
GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 pan-sharpened imagery for
object-based classification in urban environments.
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34; 2583–
2606.
Al-Ahmadi, F. S., A.S. Hames, 2009. Comparison of four
classification methods to extract land use and land cover
from raw satellite images for some remote arid areas,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. JKAU. Earth Science, 20;
167-191.
Bargiel, D., 2013. Capabilities of high resolution satellite
radar for the detection of semi-natural habitat structures
and grasslands in agricultural landscapes. Ecological
Informatics, 13; 9-16.
Bishop, Y.M.M., S.E. Fienberg, W. Paul, Holland, 1975.
Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice.
MIT Press, Cambridge.
Bovolo, F., L. Bruzzone, L. Carlin, 2010. A novel
technique for sub-pixel image classification based on
support vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Image
Processing, 19; 2983 – 2999.
Bray, M., D. Han, 2004. Identification of support vector
machines for runoff modelling. Journal of
Hydroinformatics, 6; 265–280.
Brown, M., H. Lewis, S. Gunn, 2000. Linear spectral
mixture models and support vector machines for remote
sensing, IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote
Sensing, 38 (5); 2346–2360.
Chu, T.H., L. Ge, A.H. Ng, C. Rizos, 2012. Application
of Genetic Algorithm and Support Vector Machine in
Classification of Multisource Remote Sensing Data.
International Journal of Remote Sensing Applications,
2; 1-11.
De Backer, A., S. Adam, J. Monbaliu, E. Toorman, M.
Vincx, S. Degraer, 2009. Remote Sensing of
Biologically Reworked Sediments: A Laboratory
Experiment. Estuaries and Coasts. DOI
10.1007/s12237-009-9204-6.
Demorate, F. 1998. Land cover mapping estimated in
Rendonia, Brazil. Journal of Remote Sensing, 19;
17-29.
Dixon, B., N. Candade, 2008. Multispectral land use
classification using neural networks and support vector
machines: one or the other, or both, International
Journal of Remote Sensing 29; 1185–1206.
Du, Y., C. Chang, H. Ren, C. Chang, J.O. Jensen, F.M.
D’Amico, 2004. New hyperspectral discrimination
measure for spectral characterization. Optical
Engineering, 43; 1777- 1786.
Duncan, D.B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F tests.
Biometrics, 11:1–42, 1955.
Elizabeth, A.W., L.S. William, G. Corinna, H. Diane,
2006. Land use and land cover mapping from diverse
data sources for an arid urban environments.
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30; 320–
346.
Foody, G.M. 2004. Thematic map comparison: evaluating
the statistical significance of differences in
classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering
and Remote Sensing, 70; 627–633.
Foody, G.M., A. Mathur, 2004. A relative evaluation of
multiclass image classification by support vector
machines. IEEE Trans Geosciences Remote Sensing,
42; 1335–1343
Friedman, M., A. Kandel, 1999. Introduction to Pattern
Recognition: Statistical, Structural, Neural, and Fuzzy
Logic Approaches. World Scientific Pub Co Inc, 1999.
Ghimire, S., H. Wang, 2012. Classification of image pixels
based on minimum distance and hypothesis testing.
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 56; 2273–
2287.
Gualtieri, J.A., R.F. Cromp, 1998. Support vector machines
for hyperspectral remote sensing classification. In:
Proceedings of the 27th AIPR Workshop: Advances in
Computer Assisted Recognition, Washington, DC, 27
October. SPIE, Washington, DC, pp. 221–232.
Halder, A., A. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, 2011. Supervised and
unsupervised landuse map generation from remotely 

sensed images using ant based systems. Applied Soft
Computing. In press.
Han, D., L. Chan, N. Zhu, 2007. Flood forecasting using
support vector machines. Journal of Hydroinformatics,
9; 267–276.
Hannv, Z., J. Qigang, X. Jiang, 2013. Coastline Extraction
Using Support Vector Machine from Remote Sensing
Image. Journal of Multimedia, 8; 175-182.
Hopkins, P.F., A.L. Maclean, T.M. Lillesand, 1988.
Assessment of thematic mapper imagery for forestry
application under lake states conditions,
Photogrameteric Engineering and Remote Sensing,
54; 61-68.
Huang, C., L.S. Davis, J.R.G. Townshend, 2002. An
assessment of support vector machines for land cover
classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing,
23; 725–749.
Jacqueminet, C., S. Kermadi, K. Michel, D. Béal, M.
Gagnage, F. Branger, S. Jankowfsky, I. Braud,
2013. Land cover mapping using aerial and VHR
satellite images for distributed hydrological modelling
of periurban catchments: Application to the Yzeron
catchment (Lyon, France). Journal of Hydrology, 485;
68–83.
Jensen, J. 2005. Introductory digital image processing: A
remote sensing perspective (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kavzoglu, T., P.M. Mather, 2003. The use of
backpropagating artificial neural networks in land
covers classification. International Journal of Remote
Sensing, 24; 4907-4938.
Kruse, F.A., A.B. Lefkoff, J.B. Boardman, K.B.
Heidebrecht, A.T. Shapiro, P.J. Barloon, A.F.H. Goetz,
1993. The spectral image processing system (SIPS) -
interactive visualization and analysis of imaging
spectrometer data. Remote Sensing of the Environment,
44; 145 - 163.
Liu, Z.K., J.Y. Xiao, 1991. Classification of remotelysensed
image data using artificial neural networks,
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12; 2433–
2438.
Lu, D., Q. Weng, 2007. A survey of image classification
methods and techniques for improving classification
performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing,
28; 823-870.
Luc, B., B. Deronde, P. Kempeneers, W. Debruyn, S.
Provoost, 2005. Optimized Spectral Angle Mapper
classification of spatially heterogeneous dynamic dune
vegetation, a case study along the Belgian coastline.
The 9th International Symposium on Physical
Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing
(ISPMSRS). Beijing, pp 17-19.
Mantero, P., G. Moser, S.B. Serpico, 2005. Partially
supervised classification of remote sensing images
through SVM-based probability density estimation.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,
43; 559–570.
Mazer, A.S., M. Martin, M. Lee, J.E. Solomon, 1988.
Image processing software for imaging spectrometry
analysis, Remote Sensing of the Environment, 24; 201-
210.
Melgani, F., L. Bruzzone, 2004. Classification of
hyperspectral remote sensing images with support
vector machines. IEEE Transactions Geosciences
Remote Sensing, 7; 1778–1790.
Mountrakis, G., J. Im, C. Ogole, 2011. Support vector
machines in remote sensing: Areview. ISPRS Journal of
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66; 247–259.
Mulder, N., L. Spreeuwers, 1991. Neural networks applied
to the classification of remotely sensed data, in:
Proceedings of IGARSS, Espoo, Finland.
Munoz-Marf, J., L. Bruzzone, G. Camps-Vails, 2007. A
support vector domain description approach to
supervised classification of remote sensing images.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,
45; 2683-2692.
Oommen, T., D. Misra, N.K.C. Twarakavi, A. Prakash, B.
Sahoo, S. Bandopadhyay, 2008. An Objective
Analysis of Support Vector Machine Based
Classification for Remote Sensing. Mathematical
Geosciences, 40; 409-424.
Otukei, J.R., T. Blaschke, 2010. Land cover change
assessment using decision trees, support vector
machines and maximum likelihood classification
algorithms. International Journal of Applied Earth
Observation and Geoinformation, 12; S27–S31.
Pal, M., P.M. Mather, 2005. Support vector machines for
classification in remote sensing. International Journal of
Remote Sensing, 26(5); 1007–1011.
Perumal, K., R. Bhaskaran, 2010. Supervised classification
performance of multispectral images. Journal of
Computing, 2(2); 124-129.
Petropoulos, G., W. Knorr, M. Scholze, L. Boschetti, G.
Karantounias, 2010. Combining ASTER multispectral
imagery analysis and support vector machines for rapid
and cost-effective post-fire assessment: a case study
from the Greek wildland fires of 2007. Natural Hazards
Earth System Sciences, 10; 305–317.
Petropoulos, G.P., C. Kontoes, I. Keramitsoglou, 2011.
Burnt area delineation from a uni-temporal perspective
based on Landsat TM imagery classification using
Support VectorMachines, 13; 70–80.
Qiu, F., J.R. Jensen, 2004. Opening the black box of
neural networks for remote sensing image
classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing,
25; 1749-1768.
Rajesh, B.T., M. Yuji, 2009. Urban mapping, accuracy, &
image classification: A comparison of multiple
approaches in Tsukuba City, Japan. Applied
Geography, 29; 135–144.
Remesan, R., M. Bray, M.A. Shamim, H. DaWei, I.
Cluckie, Y. Chen, V. Babovic, L. Konikow, A.
Mynett, S. Demuth, 2009. Rainfall– runoff
modeling using a wavelet-based hybrid SVM scheme.
IAHS Press.
Richards, J.A. 1999. Remote Sensing Digital Image
Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p.240.
Richards, J.A., X. Jia, 2006. Remote Sensing Digital Image
Analysis: An Introduction. Springer Verlag.
Salberg, B., R. Jenssen, 2012. Land-cover classification of
partly missing data using support vector machines. 

International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33; 4471-
4481.
Sanchez-Hernandez, C., D.S. Boyd, G.M. Foody, 2007.
Mapping specific habitats from remotely sensed
imagery: Support vector machine and support vector
data description based classification of coastal saltmarsh
habitats. Ecological Informatics, 2; 83–88.
Schalkoff, R.J. 1997. Artificial Neural Networks. McGraw-
Hill Companies.
Schneider, A, 2012. Monitoring land cover change in urban
and peri-urban areas using dense time stacks of Landsat
satellite data and a data mining approach. Remote
Sensing of Environment, 124; 689-704.
Shim, D, 2014. Remote sensing place: Satellite images as
visual spatial imaginaries. Geoforum, 51; 152–160.
Sohn, Y., N.S. Rebello, 2002. Supervised and
Unsupervised Spectral Angle Classifiers.
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing,
68; 1271-1280.
Srivastava, P., D. Han, M.A. Rico-Ramirez, M. Bray, T.
Islam, 2012. Selection of classification techniques for
land use/land covers change investigation. Advances in
Space Research, 50; 1250–1265b.
Srivastava, P., G. Kiran, M. Gupta, N. Sharma, K.
Prasad, 2012. A study on distribution of heavy metal
contamination in the vegetables using GIS and
analytical technique. International Journal of Ecology
and Development, 21; 89–99a.
Szuster, B.W., Q. Chen, M. Borger, 2011. A comparison
of classification techniques to support land cover and
land use analysis in tropical coastal zones. Applied
Geography, 31; 525–532.
Tigges, J., T. Lakes, P. Hostert, 2013. Urban vegetation
classification: Benefits of multitemporal RapidEye
satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 136; 66-
75.
Vapnik, V.N. 2000. The Nature of Statistical Learning
Theory. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 120; 129-
140.
Vapnik, V.N., A.Y. Chervonenkis, 1971. On the uniform
convergence of relative frequencies of events to their
probabilities. Theory of Probability and its
Applications, 16; 264p.
Volpi, M., D. Tuia, F. Bovolo, M. Kanevski, L.
Bruzzone, 2013. Supervised change detection in VHR
images using contextual information and support vector
machines. International Journal of Applied Earth
Observation and Geoinformation, 27; 77-85.
Xing, E.P., A.Y. Ng, M.I. Jordan, S. Russell, 2003.
Distance metric learning, with application to
clustering with side-information. In Advances in
NIPS. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Zare Abyaneh, H., A. Moghaddamnia, M. Bayat Varkeshi,
S. Marofi, O. Kisi, 2011. Performance Evaluation
of ANN and ANFIS Models for Estimating Garlic Crop
Evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
Engineering, 137 (5); 280–286.
Zhang, Y., D. Huang, M. Ji, F. Xie, 2011. Image
segmentation using PSO and PCM with Mahalanobis
distance. Expert Systems with Applications, 38; 9036–
9040.
Zhou, F., A. Zhang, L. Townley-Smith, 2013. A data
mining approach for evaluation of optimal time-series
of MODIS data for land cover mapping at a regional
level. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote
Sensing, 84;114–129.
Zhou, Z., S. Wei, X. Zhang, X. Zhao, 2007. Remote
sensing image segmentation based on self organizing
map at multiple scales, in: Proceedings of SPIE
Geoinformatics: Remotely Sensed Data and
Information, USA, pp; 122–126.